I opened a pull request to bring more attention to this issue in a sarcastic way on the ASF website repository: https://github.com/apache/www-site/pull/142. They marked as spam as closed conversation to contributors. When it comes to DEI, we underestimate how groomed society is in the degrading of other cultures and peoples, especially those who are the most marginalized. It’s easy to ignore, easy to forget, and easy to mark as spam and wipe their hands clean. To be fair, probably not the type of issue to reply to. But I can only imagine what they are thinking, probably distorted in all the colonial and appropriative ways one can think.
It is not uncommon to learn about non-Indigenous entities appropriating Indigenous culture but none of them are as large, prestigious, or well-known as The Apache® Software Foundation is in software circles. They are known for the Apache® Software License, an open-source software license, and the Apache® HTTP Server, which is used nearly everywhere to proxy requests to incoming servers. The nonprofit entity was established in 1999. One of the founders, Brian Behlendorf, describes how he came about choosing the name Apache in the documentary “Trillions and Trillions Served”:
I suggested the name Apache partly because the web technologies at the time that were launching were being called cyber this or spider that or something on those themes and I was like we need something a little more interesting, a little more romantic, not to be a cultural appropriator or anything like that, I had just seen a documentary about Geronimo and the last days of a Native American tribe called the Apaches, right, who succumbed to the invasion from the West, from the United States, and they were the last tribe to give up their territory and for me that almost romantically represented what I felt we were doing with this web-server project… — Brian Behlendorf
There are several things that Behlendorf says that perpetuate Indigenous erasure. Indigenous erasure is the systemic process of opposing, removing, re-framing, and undermining Indigenous presence, past and present, within the broader historical narrative from which they originated and continue to exist. Behlendorf says “the last days of” to frame Apache existence as in the past as opposed to the present. This erasure removes responsibility from the perpetrator of the erasure to acknowledge Indigenous people here and now and reckon with the reality that their actions are an extension of the colonial entity the Apache fought against. There are currently 8 federally recognized tribes that carry on the Apache name:
- Apache Tribe of Oklahoma
- Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma
- Jicarilla Apache Nation, New Mexico
- Mescalero Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation, New Mexico
- San Carlos Apache Tribe of the San Carlos Reservation, Arizona
- Tonto Apache Tribe of Arizona
- White Mountain Apache Tribe of the Fort Apache Reservation, Arizona
- Yavapai-Apache Nation of the Camp Verde Indian Reservation, Arizona
Organizations that say they support Indigenous peoples while using erasure type language is harmful. This type of erasure undermines Indigenous sovereignty, self-determination, and respect. Ultimately, undermining the foundation’s work to better serve marginalized communities.
Romanticizing Indigenous culture is another theme in Behlendorf’s statement above. Romanticizing is framing past Indigenous societies as pure, reverent, and simple. However, Indigenous societies were, and still are, complex and full of the many contradictions found in modern societies. The desire to play off of this stereotype of Indigenous people is harmful. It categorizes Indigenous people within the bounds of the stereotype forced upon them, making it difficult for non-Indigenous peoples to see them differently. It also distances Indigenous people from modern technology, the very thing the foundation represents. In addition to representing a “simpler” time, Indigenous names and imagery are also used to represent the “warrior” spirit. Hence why many sports teams, and countless other colleges and grade schools, use “Indian” imagery as a way to represent them on the “battlefield.”
Romanticizing Indigenous cultures is a way of framing them as static rather than dynamic. It also fails to acknowledge years of war, forced assimilation, and other adverse policies embedded as historical trauma throughout the generations and up to this day. Organizations that say they support Indigenous peoples but who lack any real connection to them, instead relying on historical stereotypes, fail to be allies to those they attempt to emulate.
Additional information about the name can be found on the foundation’s website. The foundation describes how they do things as “The Apache® Way,” their logo is a feather, and even went so far as to trademark the name Apache®. When reading the About Our Name page, they say:
The name “Apache” was chosen out of reverence and appreciation for the people and tribes who refer to themselves as “Apache”
By not enumerating the Apache nations, they fail to acknowledge and respect the name’s provenance and origin, sidestepping any accountability the foundation should have towards them.
On occasion, we have been asked about claims about use of the “Apache” name by the Apache Native American communities. During its twenty-five years of use of “Apache” as part of its name, the ASF has never been involved in any legal dispute with Native American communities or any other party in relation to the use of the “Apache” name.
This assumes any one of the 8 Apache nations wants to give any legitimacy to The Apache® Software Foundation’s trademark claim. Least of all, in a court system that has historically ruled against the sovereignty of Indigenous peoples. Imagining the impact of such a court ruling on the culture, one can understand how risky it would be to dispute it.
We are honored that both The Apache Software Foundation and Apache Incubator logos are listed on the official website of the Apache Nation Chamber of Commerce.
A foundation the size of Apache®‘s should be able to demonstrate support beyond one page of a single website. Any indifference towards this fact demonstrates a distorted view of the foundation’s relationship with historically marginalized people.
Issues of appropriation are nothing new for Indigenous folks in the US and the world. Nonprofits are service organizations. They should be held to a higher standard when it comes to interacting with historically excluded communities. To that end, I want to re-imagine this world as a place where Indigenous people’s identities are respected, in all realms, including software engineering.
If others want to help find possible replacements for the Apache® name, check out the article below and send some ideas to their GitHub repository.
This article has Webmentions